| Your name and are you referring to a specific kind of model? Which one? | ||||
| priority of criterion | ||||
| high | medium | low | Comments | |
| minimal variation in alongshore bathymetry & topography | ||||
| good topography, not just profile, beyond profile | ||||
| good bathymetry, merged with topography | ||||
| bathymetry out to where contours are parallel to coast | ||||
| depth values [every 5 m] out to 50 m depth | ||||
| is there a reef or other offshore structure? | ||||
| vertical grading studied/sampled - vertical resolution at 1/2 cm | ||||
| horizontal grading, sampling - about every 30-50 m | ||||
| preferably cs sand and finer; no strange clasts | ||||
| grain size analysis interval at least 1/4 phi | ||||
| characterization of sediment source materials | ||||
| characterize variation in internal stratigraphy | ||||
| sediment thickness distribution; evidence of internal erosion | ||||
| deposit field descriptions [peels, photos-not only!!!] | ||||
| e.g., evidence of erosion, intraclasts, other clasts, heavy mins | ||||
| sedimentary structures - peels help!!!! | ||||
| Site description-evidence of erosion | ||||
| [measured] tsunami water depths onshore with error bars | ||||
| 1-D flow preferred for simple start; working toward 2-D | ||||
| sediment limit; inundation limit | ||||
| evidence of velocities | ||||
| flow directions - indicators in sediment preferred [not surface] | ||||
| uniform vegetation, simple | ||||
| pre-tsunami and post-tsunami vegetation noted - height, density, diameter | ||||
| known or low tidal variation - water level known in case study | ||||
| no post-tsunami modification | ||||
| known wave form [tide gage data?] | ||||
| other profiles along the coast with topography and sediment limit | ||||
| simple wave | ||||
| simple deposit | ||||
| tsunami source studied/known | ||||
| OTHER | ||||